“Promoting Fear and the Cost of Doing Nothing” Will it put Netanyahu and Harper in the same camp come Election Day?

Like March itself Benjamin Netanyahu blew into Washington last week with everyone roaring about the fear of fallout. The outrage and the impact was just that – fear. He and the speech he gave went out like a lamb, with a nonplussed President, and US-Israel relations while somewhat bruised at the moment – still intact. For now. 

Netanyahu’s platform operates on two parts both at home and abroad – fear mongering scenarios and maintaining an unmoving status quo on security and the economy rather than initiating change. But there may just be a cost to that.

Many are still scratching their heads as to the point of that visit. It was clear Netanyahu diverges from the US approach to negotiations with Iran. However it’s also pretty clear that the security service in Israel disagrees with Netanyahu. Upon his return he was welcomed to tens of thousands protesting in Tel Aviv last Saturday evening.  Former Mossad head Meir Dagan and others in Israel’s security establishment demanded a return to normalcy and responsible leadership. Each speaker criticized Netanyahu’s tenure of non-action on domestic issues and intractability on pressing security concerns. The “Commanders for Israel’s Security” called for a refocusing on the country’s domestic priorities from the failing economy for the middle class earners, affordable housing shortages and stabilizing relations with the Palestinians.

What was clear from the rally and the voiced frustrations is that the message Netanyahu is bringing, be it in Washington or at home in Israel is one that isn’t necessarily working. It’s not resonating with the Israeli population and increasingly not with Jewish communities in the Diaspora as well.

But why? It worked before... Because eventually even with a clear position you have to initiate and engage to create change and not stand on the sidelines. Like children on a playground you can’t influence, much less control a situation from outside of the sandbox – you have to get in, move around and yes sometimes get dirty.  In other words you need to steer your boat out of the harbour sometimes.

For Israeli’s taking calculated risks is hardwired into our DNA. There are always threats, however Israelis move forward anyway – whether its to return to a synagogue after a terrorist shooting or dusting yourself off to go about business after each air raid siren.  Because the right to live equally and peacefully is exercised daily in spite of risk. To negotiate and have a backup plan is how the Israeli modus operandi has always survived and even thrived. Its part of the Israeli makeup – to be bold, take a chance whether you’re a high-tech start up, an Israeli Arab challenging the national question of equality, or a young politician trying to stop a bill from being passed that will drain the nation’s resources in favour of settlements in the West Bank. Because its worth the risk to get a better deal.

Strangely, Netanyahu has never operated that way. In fact he’d rather hold all the cards and step out of the ring altogether. The hardliner coalition he enjoyed in his previous term by creating the largest government in history meant that he had no opposition, no critics and no alternative. This also resulted in no peace initiative, no drive to improve the economy and no challenge to the growing influence of the religious right. His current term was cut short for exactly that reason – neither HaTnua under Tzipi Livni or Yesh Atid under Yair Lapid could tolerate such a push of power when it came to undermining the core values of equality of citizenship in a democracy – even if that democracy is the State of Israel.

And its that intolerance to such tactics of maintaining power, of fear mongering and inaction when change is so desperately needed that became the beginning of Netanyahu’s power base unraveling. His hold in next week’s elections is strongly being challenged for all of these reasons. As some have said a “six year itch” with Netanyahu may certainly be on the table with Israeli voters.

Over on this side of the world, Benjamin Netanyahu’s well-known affinity with Stephen Harper (one could even go so far to call it a “bromance”) is rooted in part because they hold the same ideals when it comes to power and how to hold on to it. I dare to say power and not leadership here because for each their vision is to be able to stay governing the public through messages that the ship in the harbour that is safe and secure for now is lost without them. 

However that’s not what a boat’s meant to do.

Be it the environment or the economy in Canada – keeping the boat docked means that it’s getting slammed into the pier and starting to crack. Our environmental policies are falling so far behind in the name of oil industry that its unlikely we will catch up unless we make drastic changes soon. Canadians hold the beauty and bounty of this country in high regard and so should our leadership.

Looking to the economy – staying the course hasn’t helped much. Falling oil prices have triggered growth rate cuts already in the first quarter of this year. Balancing the budget will not be enough to convince voters of who is holding the purse in 2015. New York Times columnist Paul Krugman argues that no one really understands debt and that we need more not less debt on the public books to get the economy moving or else it will stagnate i.e. nothing will change if we keep shifting the budget lines on what we owe ourselves and cutting back on what makes an economy and a society healthy. So is staying the course and fear of debt really what we need?  Can’t we trust ourselves to spend a little more to gain a lot? Does balancing the deficit now really matter that much in the bigger picture?

Then there is Bill C-51. Responding to the changing and threatening landscape of terrorism by increasing the surveillance rights of security institutions without question. At the same time its risking the privacy rights of individuals to be questioned under new legislation. The bill is testing not only the boundaries of freedom and civil liberties, but ratcheting up the fear mongering tactics at home. The threat – that has come under the banner of ISIS and Islamic fundamentalism is unleashing a new cultural vitriol on the political landscape.

Rising intolerance and ignorance is beginning to stain the rich fabric that makes Canada the modern multicultural society that it is.  Justin Trudeau’s speech this week highlights the fears that are being stirred and unexamined as a result of these new legislative directions. Most importantly he emphasized the need for liberties to be protected for all Canadians. He explored the fact that while we are striving for a truly diverse and free society here in Canada, we have had an evolution of that value develop over time into hard won policies and practices that we can be proud of, with an honest look at the past.  A national conversation on safety should not boil down to the wearing of the niqab. That being said, while the need to examine the efficacy of our security in Canada certainly must be done - is it through new legislation or refinancing the already existing backlog in our security services?

In short we are less safe when we prevent Canadian citizens from wearing their faith publicly than when we include it as part of an evolving Canadian society built on liberty and inclusion of the other. We are less safe when we cut back on the resources we need and increase legislation that limits our freedoms. Stephen Harper should call his friend Bibi for a check-in on cultural exclusionist practices – he should know. The Israeli government fell in a large part due to the attempt to pass a Jewish Nation State law that would in fact limit the rights of its Arab citizens. The result – the newly formed Arab party ticket may just form the official opposition in next week’s elections for the first time in the country's history.

We risk everything when we do nothing to initiate change for the better.

So if the cost of fear politics and stagnancy are pretty clear I must ask of these politicians - What is the advantage of steering a ship that doesn’t go anywhere? Next week’s elections in Israel will give us an indication of what happens to an electorate when you place power hand in hand with fear. Leadership means helming a ship that sails through change. Propping up fear eventually leaves you alone at the landing.

A ship is always safe at shore – but that’s not what it’s built for.

-Albert Einstein

Post Script: At the time of this posting Israeli polls showed 24 seats for the joint ticket of Livni-Herzog for Hamachaneh HaTziyoni, 21 for Netanyahu and the Likud and 13 seats for the Arab joint ticket making it the third largest party.

How I Fell for An Israeli-Arab Muslim Woman for All the Right Reasons

Declaration of Independence

I’m on fire, the way one gets when things just light you up and keep burning. It started with a crush that lit the flame earlier last week but ended in a blaze Sunday morning at a Jewish-Arab school in Jerusalem and a synagogue in Tel Aviv. You might be wondering “Who”? Your next question “Why”? I’ll sigh and realize that its time for me to say the things Jews in the Diaspora aren’t supposed to say. My heart is in anguish as my beloved city burns. The country of my soul is struggling under the pain of hate and violence while it grasps at straws to preserve its identity. In all of this an Israeli-Arab woman’s call to action out of sheer frustration and anger was the siren we should be tuning in to for making a change rather than playing the same old songs of violence and victimhood.

But let’s start at the beginning. Early last week after the tragic events at a synagogue in Jerusalem’s Har Nof neighbourhood I was inspired to hear the words of Lucy Aharish the Israeli-Arab anchor of the Hebrew news channel I24. Speaking on the weekend primetime current affairs magazine “Yoman” (Journal) she described her outrage on the vicious attack against devout Jewish victims killed during morning prayers. Touted as brave in the face of “haters” from extremists from the Arab community and the Jewish Israeli Right – she spoke out against the violence with clarity and support for the families and decried the heinous acts of the perpetrators.

However she didn’t stop there - she directed us to a valuable personal view on root causes of terror, particularly within the Israeli-Arab minority of which much of the renewed violence and this summer’s war with Gaza has grown from smouldering anger to outright violence. She spoke of the impact on generations of how and what we teach our children in any community trying to navigate between coexistence and hate. She spoke about ignorance and opportunity. She told us that she’s sick of crying and being angry. She’s tired of holding on to a history of hatred for being conquered and swallowed up by Israeli society. She acknowledged that it’s not easy and even rare to step out of your circle of victimhood. That it’s even harder in the face of inequality to step forward and offer something different. She explained that children, even with the opportunities to be educated, to be enlightened and part of an open society, can’t step over hate when they have to walk through a security checkpoint every day to get there.

On national television Lucy Aharish cried “Enough!” I am here and want it to be different. I talk like you, I’m educated like you, I even work for you and yet and I will never be your equal. Because even as I sit here as an Israeli journalist among my peers, with my work standing behind me there are those at home who will say I should feel lucky that I have a job.I was instantly in love – why? Because the Jewish Left in Israel and abroad is war weary.  It’s been shouting and crying. It was eventually backed into a corner for trying to say “an end to violence and for a change towards something new”, or “a move towards a society of equal citizenship, not grudging acknowledgement of rights under the “burden” of democratic values”. And finally, finally Lucy said it loud and clear and maybe just maybe we started to listen. Here was Lucy stating that the reality for Israeli Arabs isn’t equality among equals no matter how hard she tries. I was almost giddy in seeing her honesty and resolve.

The backdrop of Lucy Aharish’s comments and her cry for equality is the hotly debated “Jewish Nation State Law” currently being drafted. The government of the day would like to pass a law that will in effect make Lucy’s reality a legally standing one. This past week the cabinet of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government approved the first draft of the bill which will recognize national and group rights of the Jewish people inside the State of Israel while recognizing only individual rights for members of other religious, national and ethnic minorities within the country. The bill is being put forward as one that would have constitutional status that will in effect make it even more difficult to strike down existing or created laws that are discriminatory against minorities. (meaning that it can only be defeated by a super majority and will have preference in judicial decision making).  By declaring Israel the Jewish Nation State first, democracy and equality will come in second when it relates to minorities.

The legal advocacy group for Arab Minority Rights in Israel - Adalah currently cites 50 or so laws within the state that are already discriminatory against minorities. But while some are saying this new bill could cause the government to fall as the country has reached its watershed point of maintaining a status quo of non-negotiation and escalating violence, others are brushing off its implications saying that the position of the bill is a long time coming of what already exists in the country.

As someone who has had their feet firmly planted in Israel and Canada for decades, I was raised and educated on the principles of the Multiculturalism Act of 1988. As someone who can and does exercise my democratic rights in both countries I can’t watch this anymore and not cry out for at least a discussion on the ramifications of where this law would take Israel. It will have an impact on its relationship to Jewish Diaspora communities who live and thrive as minorities under the policies of democratic equality in Canada, the US and in many other places in the world today. Will they chafe under this proposal while at the same time know they have a “home” to come home to? How is that we can lament and shake our heads on what is taking place in Ferguson, Missouri but not what is happening in a place that so many feel a spiritual if not cultural, social, religious and historical connection to?

Canada was one of the first countries in the world to embrace an official multiculturalism policy in the 1970s. It was the norm where I grew up. Multiculturalism guided and strengthened me in my identity when I chose to be part of the fabric and politics of Israeli society.

The Multiculturalism Act became law in 1988 and its principles have been tried and tested over and over. I am not here to say that the Canadian brand of Multiculturalism is perfect or that we have gotten it completely right by any means. There are many faults in the system of implementing the principles of the Act. But the Act itself ensures that there is always a benchmark of equality by which the debate can be guided and the principles of its establishment upheld to make improvements. The Act recognizes groups including Aboriginal peoples and the official languages of Canada French and English, however its key message is to:
“recognize and promote the understanding that multiculturalism reflects the cultural and racial diversity of Canadian society and acknowledges the freedom of all members of Canadian society as equal and able to preserve, enhance and share their cultural heritage.”

Underlying a promotion of these freedoms is the Citizenship Act that Canadians “whether by birth or by choice, enjoy equal status, are entitled to the same rights, powers and privileges and are subject to the same obligations, duties and liabilities;”

The law does not put one group ahead of another. There are exceptions and the historical quagmire of French-English, Catholic-Protestant relations still stymie provincial debates ranging from education and language laws that have and continue to influence elections here. Nevertheless all citizens are equal under the law. Israel could learn a lot from what we have to offer in lessons on how to begin to manage equality and tolerance. Learning how to establish mechanisms that strive for equality when the laws and good intentions are set into motion, even when they don’t always get it right.

To create new bedrock law that elevates one group over another in the eyes of the State goes against the foundations of coexistence that the State of Israel was established on as a Jewish and Democratic society for all of its citizens. Its own Declaration of Independence stated that it “will uphold the full social and political equality of all its citizens, without distinction of race, creed or sex; will guarantee full freedom of conscience, worship, education and culture; will safeguard the sanctity and inviolability of the shrines and Holy Places of all religions; and will dedicate itself to the principles of the Charter of the United Nations.”

And after all that we hoped for and what my new love Lucy Aharish cried out for on national television last week what transpired was that Jewish extremists torched the Max Rayne Hand in Hand Jerusalem School Saturday night. A community of 600+ students and their families at the Jewish-Arab school were confronted with messages of extremism and hatred. A school where my friends and colleagues send their children to learn how it can be different. 


From burning Arab teenagers, to burning the schools where both Arab and Jewish children find an oasis of sanity, to murdering people at worship and driving down innocents waiting for the bus home – just when will it be enough? Laws like this will let the perpetrators feel they have been vindicated on both sides. With the fear of more to come can it be any different or will my new romance with hope burn up in the poison that seems to be taking over? Israeli Labour MK Eitan Cabel said that Lucy is the nightmare of racists and partners in hate on both sides of the conflict. I’m hoping that she’s my dream come true.

To learn more about the pending bill “Jewish Nation State Law”  click here

Postscript: 8 hours after the posting of this piece the government in Israel was dissolved and elections are pending. This issue was a key point in the collapse of the coalition.

Barriers of Safety or Barriers of Fear?

 

Years ago while living in Jerusalem a visit to Canada in 2003 during the second Gulf War coined the "war on terror" elicited questions around the dinner table - Is this necessary? There isn't any real threat for us here in Canada. The decision to sit this one “out” was loud and clear from Canadians.

With several wars and up close views of more terrorist attacks than one should ever bear witness to my answer then was simple - the Middle East is a rough neighbourhood. Rife with conflict for decades it's a cauldron of poverty, physical displacement, religious fervor and political extremism. This 'hood operates in a constant state of attempting disengagement that boils over every few years into full-scale conflict as a means for survival not resolution.  Sometimes it needs some help, sometimes it doesn’t. Living in Canada then (and now) is a luxury we often take for granted. The safety and security of a democracy with moderate values and a stable economy means freedom to move and go where I want with ease.

Going to the Eaton's Centre the next day the automatic readiness for my purse to be checked as I entered the subway reminded me I wasn't in my Kansas of conflict anymore. It was a sobering insight as to what one gets used to.

Well, this week that changed – it’s a matter of if it’s a little or the beginning of a lot.  

Instinct from years of bus bombings meant brief text messages to friends in Ottawa - RU OK?

I know this routine - I can do it in my sleep - check that everyone is okay and then follow the headlines for the rest. And as the day's events unfolded I was relieved to see that the Canadian way of addressing the heightened state of alert was not with pounding music news intros and breathless reporters. It was dignified, solemn, and for those reporting hats off it was accurate and -  more importantly - calm.

So to my Canadian friends and family as you begin to digest the events of the day and process what this means - understand that what you are about to explore is the possibility of living in a different kind of 'hood. In this one you may have your bag checked when you get into a subway station or enter a public building be it a government office or going to the movies. You'll want to travel lighter to go through security checks as a general part of your day. You might wait in line - at hockey games, and even at the mall to clear a metal detector. It might become routine and sometimes necessary. It won't be a debate anymore to figure out which security detail should check bags at the entrance to Parliament Hill and how many meters away the perimeter should be because, it will just get done.

I'll smile and give you a nod as you struggle with the notion of security at home. I understand that the thought of this is grating against the principles of openness, freedom and democracy that as Canadians we hold dear. I get it - the easy walk "going up the Hill" is something veteran Liberal MP John McKay said is a loss we should lament. NDP Leader Tom Mulcair worries about Frisbee players no longer hanging out on the lawn. However the question of the day is how did an armed gunman get onto Parliament Hill and into Centre Block? The answer is that in declaring to be resilient in the fight against those who wish to elicit terror, things do have to change in how we treat our public spaces. Not because the perpetrators dictate it, not because we live in fear, but because safety comes first. Not because we are afraid but because some things have changed in the 'hood whether we like it or not.

What won't change if we choose it - is how we treat each other as Canadians. While you might have to go through a few more security checks in the future it does not change the multicultural and open society that embraces all of its citizens who in turn also embrace those values. It does not change that we are a country with one of the fastest growing immigrant populations in the world, with individuals arriving from all over the globe. Only fear changes those views, not new security barricades.

Over in that democracy in the Middle East Israelis live in this reality all the time. But the fact is that they LIVE with the security measures, they are not ruled by them. As a democratic society with an open and often outdoor culture there are festivals, public beaches, and the simple pleasure of sitting at patio cafes even in January - Israelis enjoy life to the fullest (and in Tel Aviv around the clock).

They are also paying attention and recognize the need for cautious and at times even vigilant measures.  They go to the mall and to soccer games. They go easily to City Hall, the Knesset and the Supreme Court. Israelis are truly "out and about" in word and in action - equally outspoken on both civil liberties and on the need for security. I won't deny that years of conflict have given root to loud voices and actions that are extreme, racist and yes even violent and destructive. However even in the face of that adversity there are many Israelis from the political and social spheres who hold out the hand for fairness and justice. They come together in adversity and are open to try and embrace their 'hood and everyone who lives in it for something better for themselves and for their children.

Sometimes cynical and sometimes hopeful moderates over there do try to balance on the barriers and hope to find a way to bring them down. I’ll be honest; it’s still an elusive effort. This week while Jerusalemites gathered to hear Palestinian Mira Awad and Israeli David Broza perform and share their vision of coexistence, a lone driver drove into a crowd of pedestrians killing a 3-month old infant. It was the second vehicle attack in nearly as many months.  Nevertheless people are out on the street and getting back to life. Terrorism does not have to change who you are as an individual as a community or even as a nation.

Ottawa like Jerusalem is a government town. Laden with the symbols of democracy and power they are each as big in vision as they are small in how their residents come together.  Likened to a community, both are not so much cities – but rather neighbourhoods of sorts,  close knit and protective. As the nation’s capital Ottawa is the place we turn to for answers and stability.  How did this happen? Actually we're a nation that has faced security challenges like this before, even at Centre Block, but they are so few a far between we've forgotten them. The juxtaposition of this week’s and last week's actions is nerve rattling. The global neighborhood is changing and we undoubtedly need to look at that effect carefully at home, from lone wolves and acts of violence to the messages of hate and racism that rise out of extremism and glorifying conflict.

In all of this we must also remember that as Canadians we’re not passive - we've been part of fighting forces around the globe for over a century. We know when to keep the peace and when to step up to fight for the values we hold dear. We’ve created a national identity anchored in those beliefs. Then why now are we a nation questioning whether or not to set up better barriers to protect our soldiers, our children who visit the Hill and the politicians we elect to uphold our democratic values? A metal detector further from the entrance won't change that.

Jerusalem is a town that knows intimately what acts of terror look and feel like. Ottawa doesn’t. While we examine this week and what took place the question will be was this an act of terror or a criminal one? There is no question that the actions in Ottawa and Montreal instilled fear and caused chaos while resulting in the tragic loss of life.

It’s been nearly a decade since I was asked that question of what is really necessary in facing terrorism. Then the concern was abroad and not persuasive enough to fundamentally change daily public life, even post 9/11. But before we go down that rabbit hole called terrorism now, home grown or internationally influenced, let’s take a step back and look at the facts. Mental health and isolation were root causes of motivation here. In a world of global interconnectedness via the Web those who are lonely and vulnerable can connect to extremist values and communities in a new way that we are just beginning to consider the implications of. Instead of knee jerk reactions and fear of what legislative measures and potential charter violations we will or won’t tolerate, let’s examine models to see what we need and what we don’t. Yes better security will be needed just as a general practice. But the uncomfortable carrying out of intelligence gathering that bend privacy violations to the reprecussions racial profiling is something that will take a respectful and careful examination based on facts on the ground in our home ‘hood, not out of fear but out of practical measures to uphold the values we cherish.

So yes, this will change things, but not the way you think.